SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 36210

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
Sri. Labisetty Devender – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 32826/2015



O R D E R :

This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of respondents police authorities particularly respondent No.3 in not pursuing the investigation and not arresting the unofficial respondents pursuant to registration of crime vide FIR.No.203 of 2015 dated 09.09.2015, which was registered on the file of Musheerabad Police Station and with a consequential direction to complete the investigation to file a charge sheet thereof.

2. Heard Mr. K.Rambabu Goud, learned counsel representing Mr. Vijay B.Paropakari, learned counsel for the petitioner on record and Mr. Sridhar Bhuvanagiri, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for respondent Nos.1 to

3.

3. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that, pursuant to the petitioner’s representation dated 09.09.2015, respondent No.3 failed to conduct a proper investigation and thereby arresting the unofficial respondents, in connection with FIR No.203 of 2015, dated 09.09.2015, which was registered on the file of Musheerabad Police Station under Section 306 of IPC.

4. Respondent No.3 has filed counter affidavit in the present writ petition and in para No.7 has categorically stated that, respondent No.3 completed the investigation in the said Crime and an appropriate charge sheet has been filed before the learned Court of XVII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, on 09.11.2015 vide S.R.No.7163 of 2015 against A1 to A3, who are the unofficial respondents herein.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home has informed this Court that, upon filing the charge sheet against the accused persons, the learned Magistrate had already taken cognizance of the said offence against the accused persons vide S.C.No.156 of 2016. It is also further informed that the said case itself ended in acquittal against all the accused persons.

6. In view of the foregoing discussion, the cause in the Writ Petition no longer survives. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________________

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top