IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
M/s Bhavani Trading Company – Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India – Respondent
WP 31027/2015
O R D E R:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-
“…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the action of the respondent authorities, frequently interfering the petitioners business of with the trade of whole sale and retail Business in Fire Works and Crackers in spite of having valid license and contrary to license that were issued under the form LE-3 of Explosives Rules, 2008, is arbitrary without jurisdiction, and ultra virus of powers 5th to 10th respondents and also violation of Article 19(G) of Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents herein not to interfere with the trade of whole sale, and retail Business in Fire Works, and Crackers including licensed Godowns by the licenses in the license premises in respect of M/s. Bhavani Trading Company, Godown address in Sy.No. 551, Rampally, Kareemguda, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., (License No.E/HQ/AP/21/254 (E6355), Dt.23-09-2003), Vijay shah, S/o. Jaganath Shah, Godown address in Sy.No.604, Pudoor village, R.R. District, T.S., (License No.E/HQ/AP/21/525 (E28787) Dt.06-02- 2008) and M/s. Jonnada Balaji and Company, Godown address in Sy.Nos.112 and 117, Rajabollaram village, R.R. District, T.S., (License No.E/HQ/AP/21/158 (E2684) Dt.15-
07-1988), and grant...”
2. Heard Mr. Kandula Naresh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Bhuvanagiri Sridhar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 7.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause of action in the present writ petition no longer survives for adjudication and, therefore, seeks dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home raises no objection to the said submission.
5. Recording the submissions of both learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________________
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.