SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 36568

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Somisetty Swathi – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent


THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.30164 of 2025

ORDER:

Heard Sri M.Keshav Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri N.Bhujanga Rao, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.1, Ms.Shresth Agarwal, learned counsel for respondent No.3, Sri M.P.Kashyap, learned counsel for respondent No.4, Smt T.Vidya Rani, learned Standing Counsel for BOI, for respondent No.6 and Smt K.Ramya, learned counsel for respondent No.7. Perused the record.

2. Despite service of notice, none appeared for remaining respondents.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the issue raised in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.5200 of 2024, dated 25.04.2024 and therefore, the same order may be passed in this writ petition as well. The operative portion of the said order reads as under:

“8. For the aforesaid reasons and as the procedure adopted by the respondent Nos.4 to 7 for recovery of loan amount from the petitioner, amounts to violation of the rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top