IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Somisetty Swathi – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.30164 of 2025
ORDER:
Heard Sri M.Keshav Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri N.Bhujanga Rao, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.1, Ms.Shresth Agarwal, learned counsel for respondent No.3, Sri M.P.Kashyap, learned counsel for respondent No.4, Smt T.Vidya Rani, learned Standing Counsel for BOI, for respondent No.6 and Smt K.Ramya, learned counsel for respondent No.7. Perused the record.
2. Despite service of notice, none appeared for remaining respondents.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the issue raised in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.5200 of 2024, dated 25.04.2024 and therefore, the same order may be passed in this writ petition as well. The operative portion of the said order reads as under:
“8. For the aforesaid reasons and as the procedure adopted by the respondent Nos.4 to 7 for recovery of loan amount from the petitioner, amounts to violation of the rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.