SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 36671

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Boini Santosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SMT.JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.2 seeking to quash the proceedings in Cr. No.10/RCT-ACB-MDK of 2025 the file of ACB Medak Range at Sangareddy, registered for the offences under Sections 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short ‘PC Act’).

2. Heard Sri M.V. Rajkumar Gabreil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri T. Bala Mohan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel cum Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1-ACB.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is accused No.2 and that he along with Accused Officer No.1 (AO1) have demanded and accepted bribe from the de facto complainant.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner herein is A2 and there is no reference as to the name of the petitioner in the entire complaint and that there is no material on record to show that the petitioner herein has demanded Rs.40,000/- as alleged in the complaint and that there are no allegations to attract the offence under Section 7(a) of the PC Act against the petitioner and that in the absence of demand, the said offence cannot be proved against the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top