THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.35555 of 2025

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:-

“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the representation of the petitioners, dated 11.11.2025 and 12.11.2025 requesting not to entertain any application for mutation in favour of respondent No.5 in respect of the land of in SyNo.460 admeasuring Acs.05.20 guntas (Sub Sy.No.460/UU/1 admeasuring Acs.02.20 guntas; Sy.No. 460/U admeasuring Ac.01.00 guntas; Sy.No.460/UU/2 admeasuring Ac.01.00 guntas and Sy.No.460/EE admeasuring Ac.01.00 guntas situated at Nallavelly Revenue Village, Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and also violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to entertain any application for recording the Boddu Purshotham Reddy name as pattadar in the dharani portal and for issuance of new e-digital pattadar pass book-cum-title deed in respect of the said land and pass…”

2. Heard Sri Ch.Narsi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and with their consent, this Writ Petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are the owners and possessors of the agricultural land admeasuring Acs.5.20 guntas i.e., Acs.2.20 guntas in Sy.No.460/UU/1; Ac.01.00 guntas in Sy.No.460/U; Ac.1.00 guntas in Sy.No.460/U/2 and Ac.1.00 guntas in Sy.No.460/EE, situated at Nallavelly Revenue Village, Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that, originally, petitioner No.1 had purchased the land admeasuring Acs.3.20 guntas in Sy.No.460 through unregistered sale deed and the said sadabainama was regularised vide File No.B/2145/1989 and the name of petitioner No.1 was recorded as owner in the revenue records and he was also issued pattadar passbook and title deed. Learned counsel would further submit that, in the year 2007, petitioner Nos.2 and 3 have purchased the land admeasuring Ac.1.00 guntas each in Sy.No.460 through registered sale deed bearing document Nos.8595 of 2007 and 8594 of 2007, both dated 08.08.2007. In the year 2021, petitioner No.1 had alienated the land admeasuring Ac.1.00 guntas out of Acs.3.20 guntas in Sy.No.460 in favour of petitioner No.2 through registered sale deed bearing document No.1732 of 2021, dated 24.07.2021. The petitioners were issued e-pattadar passbooks. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the unofficial respondent is claiming that he is the owner of the subject property by creating a sham registered sale deed bearing document No.4163 of 2006, dated 17.03.2006 in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.1.36 guntas in Sy.No.460 and filed a false suit vide O.S.No.83 of 2021, wherein status quo was granted and the said suit is pending on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ibrahimpatnam. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that the petitioners also filed a suit for declaration of title against the unofficial respondent in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.2.00 guntas vide O.S.No.166 of 2024 and the same is pending before the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ibrahimpatnam. Subsequently, the unofficial respondent and others filed a suit for declaration in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.3.20 guntas vide O.S.No.58 of 2025, wherein the learned Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ibrahimpatnam, has granted status quo vide order, dated 20.02.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that, by suppressing the real facts and without impleading the petitioners as party respondents, the unofficial respondent has filed W.P.No.18689 of 2025 before