Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
The chief General Manager – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Ankit Packaging limited – Respondent
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No. 36841 OF 2024
O R D E R:
This Writ Petition is filed aggrieved by the order passed by the 2nd respondent - Vidyut Ombudsman in Appeal No. 28 of 2023-24, dated 23.10.2023.
2. The case of petitioners – TGSPDCL is that the 1st respondent is a HT Consumer vide HT SC No. MDK 558 (SGR 558); power supply was released on 28.01.1993 and it was disconnected on 30.12.2009 due to non-payment of Current Consumption Charges. Subsequently, the 1st respondent sought restoration of power supply under Sick Industries Revival Scheme. In that regard, petitioners and the 1st respondent entered into a separate HT Agreement on 10.05.2010 and power supply was restored on 11.05.2010 under the provisions of Sick Industries Revival Scheme. As the 1st respondent has once again defaulted in payment of C.C. Charges, power supply was disconnected by petitioners on 09.08.2010. In spite of several notices, dues amounting to Rs. 12,30,603/- were not paid by the 1st respondent. Therefore, as per Clause 5.9.4.3 of General Terms and Conditions of Supply (GTCS in short), the HT Agreement of the 1st respondent was terminated on 10.05.2012 ie. after completion of min
The Ombudsman exceeded jurisdiction by preventing surcharge collection as per regulatory provisions, affirming that tariffs under the Electricity Act must be adhered to.
Consumers are liable to pay electricity dues as per the provisions of the Electricity Act, and the authority to recover such dues is upheld by the court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
