IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Leeladhara Rao Marupudi – Appellant
Versus
ITO (INT Taxn)- 1 – Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE NARSI NG RAO NANDI KONDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.32442 of 2024
ORDER:
(per the Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)
Heard Mr. Mohd. Mukhairuddin, learned counsel for the petitioner / assessee; Mr. Vijhay K. Punna, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, and the learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing on behalf of respondent No.3.
2. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner assailing the assessment order dated 06.05.2022 passed by respondent No.2 / Assessing Officer holding that since the petitioner has failed to disclose the cash deposits to the tune of Rs.1,52,10,000/-, the same was added as unexplained cash credits in the hands of the petitioner and it was also held that the petitioner shall be liable to pay penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (briefly the ‘Act’ hereinafter) for concealment of income.
3. The primary challenge by the petitioner while assailing the impugned order of assessment rather than preferring an statutory appeal was that:-
a) The proceedin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.