SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 37041

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
YUVARAJ RAMAKRISHNA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TELANGANA – Respondent


THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION No.14145 OF 2025

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners-accused Nos.1 and 2 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No.369 of 2025 of O.U. City Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences under Sections 79, 351(2) and 352 read with 3(5) BNS and 66D of Information Technology Act, 2008. 2. Heard Sri P. Pratap, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that respondent No.2-de facto complainant has filed second F.I.R. basing on similar set of allegations, which is not tenable in the eye of law. Two F.I.Rs. cannot be lodged with regard to the same incident and same offences against the petitioners. He further submitted that on the earlier complaint, charge sheet has already been filed and the same was taken cognizance by the learned IV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, and numbered as C.C.No.6403 of 2025, and in the said case, the mobile phone of petitioner No.1 was seized. Since there is no material in the earlier case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top