O R D E R :

This Writ Petition is filed challenging the proceedings No.A/93/08 dt. 05.09.2008 issued by the 2^nd respondent. 2. Heard Sri K.Vasudeva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner; Smt. Manideepika, learned Government Pleader for Women and Child Welfare appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2; and learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent No.3.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner applied for the post of Anganwadi worker and is eligible for appointment as such in all the categories and in the selection procedure, the petitioner was selected, but the appointment order was issued to the 4^th respondent. The contention of the petitioner is that the 4^th respondent is not the resident of Sriramulapally or Suglampally.

4. Per contra , learned counsel for the official respondents submitted that the 4^th respondent is resident of Suglampally Village. To that extent, the respondents have filed a counter along with the nativity certificate and the other aspect of the consideration of the 4^th respondent is that at the time of interview, respondent No.4 had got more marks than the petitioner.

5. In view of the above submissions made by bot