THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA SECOND APPEAL No.530 of 2025

JUDGMENT:

Heard Sri M. Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant on admission. Perused the entire record.

2. The Second Appeal is preferred aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 30.07.2025 in A.S.No.9 of 2019 passed by the learned IV Additional District Judge, Nizamabad, (‘First Appellate Court’), wherein the appeal was dismissed, confirming the judgment and decree dated 11.03.2019 in O.S.No.92 of 2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad, (‘Trial Court’).

3. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent herein filed suit in O.S.No.92 of 2014 seeking declaration of title, recovery of possession, damages and consequent relief of perpetual injunction, after delivery of possession against the appellant herein. In said suit, the respondent examined himself and another witness as P.Ws.1 and 2 and got marked Exs.A-1 to A-24. The appellant got examined D.Ws.1 to 4 and got marked Exs.B-1 to B-20. The learned Trial Court examined Exs.A-1 to A-20 and Exs.B-1 to B-17 and arrived at conclusion that the respondent is the original owner of the suit schedule property i.e., agricultural lands in Sy.No.36/6