IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
SMT.D. PUSHPAMALA – Appellant
Versus
KANKANTI NARAYAN REDDY(Died per LR who is R-19) AND 22 OTHERS – Respondent
I N THE HI GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE NARSI NG RAO NANDI KONDA CI VI L REVI SI ON PETI TI ON Nos.264&284 of 2018
17.11.2025 Between:
Smt. D. Pushpamala (died per LRs)
… Petitioners AND Kankanti Narayan Reddy (died per LRs), and Others … Respondents
COMMON ORDER
These Civil Revision Petitionsare filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the common order dated 26.12.2017 in I.A.Nos.218 and 219 of 2017 in O.S.No.63 of 2006 while I.A.No.218 of 2017 was filed under Order VIRule 17 R/w Section 151 of CPC seeking amendment of the plaint; I.A.No.219 of 2017 was filed seeking reopening of the suit for carrying out amendments.
2. Both the I.As were disposed of by way of a common order dated 26.12.2017. Though the I.A orders were assailed under two different revision petitions, but as a lead, the Civil Revision Petition No.264 of 2018 was filed being aggrieved by the dismissal of the amendment application vide I.A.No.218 of 2017. If the Court comes to a conclusion that the amendment which is sought has to be allowed, then the question of reopening of the suit arises. As such, this Court is of the opinion that, i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.