IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
Shaik Jani Miya – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 8490/2021
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION No.8490 of 2021
ORDER
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Smt. S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and perused the material available on record.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not mutating the entries in the revenue records relating to the land to an extent of Ac.1.31 guntas in Sy.No.47/2, situated at Kagita Ramachandrapuram Village, Nadigudem Mandal, Suryapet District as illegal and arbitrary.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the land to an extent of Ac.1.31 guntas in Sy.No.47/2, situated at Kagita Ramachandrapuram Village, Nadigudem Mandal, Suryapet District. The petitioner has purchased the said land under registered Sale Deed vide Document No.5839 of 2015 on the file of Joint Sub- Registrar, Nalgonda (O.B), dated 04.06.2015. After purchasing the said property, the petitioner made an application to the respondent No.2 for mutation of entries in the revenue records, but the same was not done by the respondent No.2. In view of the same, the petitioner made an application through Dharani Portal vide Application No.2100032166 for slot booking and the said application was submitted by paying mutation charges and PPB charges along with registration document. In spite of booking slot, the respondent No.2 has postponed the mutation of entries in the revenue records and has stated that further date will be informed to the petitioner. Thereafter, the respondents have not informed the petitioner about the mutation of records. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has approached this Court questioning the inaction of the respondents for mutation of records.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further submits that in spite of lapse of more than 4 years, the respondent authorities did not choose to file a counter denying the averments made by the petitioner in the writ affidavit, in view of the same, requested to direct the respondents to dispose of the application made by the petitioner dated 08.03.2021 vide Application No.2100032166 for mutation of records basing on the document filed by the petitioner.
5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that the respondents will pass appropriate orders on the application made by the petitioner through Dharani Portal in the year, 2021 and communicate the same to the petitioner in due course.
6. In view of the submissions made on either side, without going into merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to dispose of the application made by the petitioner vide Application No.2100032166, dated 08.03.2021 through Dharani Portal for mutation of entries in the revenue records relating to the land to an extent of Ac.1.31 guntas in Sy.No.47/2, situated at Kagita Ramachandrapuram Village, Nadigudem Mandal, Suryapet District, within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________
JUSTICE K. SARATH
Date: 12.11.2025
bb
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.