IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
Sri. Chintala Surender Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 16139/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD *****
WRIT PETITION No.16139 of 2025 Between:
Chinthala Surender Reddy and two others …Petitioner AND
1. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department & Stamps and Registration, Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others …Respondents ORDER PRONOUNCED ON: 11.11.2025 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
1. Whether Reporters of Local : Yes/No newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment ?
2. Whether the copies of judgment may : Yes/No be marked to Law Reports/Journals
3. Whether Their Lordship/Ladyship : Yes/No wish to see the fair copy of judgment _____________________ JUSTICE K.SARATH THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH + WRIT PETITION No.16139 OF 2025 %Dated 11.11.2025 Between :
# Chinthala Surender Reddy and two others …Petitioner and
1. $ The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, and Stamps & Registration, Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others …Respondents ! Counsel for Petitioner : Sri B.S.Prasad Learned Senior Counsel appearing for M/s. Pearl Law Associates ^ Counsel for Respondents : Mrs.S.Sravanthi, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration.
< GIST :
> HEAD NOTE :
? Cases referred :
1. 2025 SCC Online SC 740 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.16139 OF 2025
ORDER:
1. This Writ Petition is filed questioning action of the respondent No.4 in refusing to register the three (3) sale deeds, presented by the petitioners, vide (i) refusal Order No.2, in letter No.123/2025 (ii) refusal Order No.3, in letter No.124/2025 and (iii) refusal Order No.4 in letter No.125/2025, all dated 16.06.2025 in the respect of the total property bearing plot Nos.693 and 694 in Sy.No.174, admeasuring to an extent of 420 Sq.Yards, situated at Sai Surya Enclave, Macha Bollaram, Alwal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District (herein after referred to as ‘subject property’) and sought a direction to the respondent No.4 to receive and register the documents presented by the petitioners in respect of the subject property.
2. Heard Sri B.S.Prasad, learned Senior Counsel appearing for M/s. Pearl Law Associates, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mrs.S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Govermnet Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the respondents.
3. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are the husband and wife and the petitioner No.3 is their vendor, from whom the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 purchased subject property for a valuable consideration of Rs.39,54,000/- on 15.05.2025 vide three separate documents and presented before the respondent No.4 and the same were refused to register through impugned refusal order Nos.2, 3 and 4 in letter Nos.123, 124 and 125 of 2025 dated 16.05.2025 respectively on the ground that Smt.Sushila S.Kamath i.e. the petitioner No.3 herein, had already sold the subject property to one Ch.Srinu through document No.845/2017 on the file of SRO, Balanagar. Subsequently the said Ch.Srinu sold the same to one K.Ram Gopal Reddy and Chilukuri Srinivas Babji, who in turn sold to one Sri P.Maladri vide document No.2648/2017 and 3083/2017. The second reason stated for rejection is that the subject property is under Court litigation and O.S.No.342/2018 on the file of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgir District and also in the light of instructions issued by the Commissioner and Inspector General, Registration and Stamps vide Circular No.13450/2007 dated
21.07.2008.
4. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners would further submit that the petitioner No.3, who is the vendor of the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, purchased the subject property through registered sale deed No.2316/1997 dated 05.08.1997 from Mogulla Kistamma and 7 others thorough their agent M/s Ravi Shankar Real Estates and has been in possession of the same and on purchase of the same the petitioners 1 and 2 are in possession and enjoyment of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.