IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
K. SATHYANARAYAN REDDY – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 14501/2018
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No. 14501 OF 2018
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of their open land admeasuring 2860 Sq.,Yards or 2391.33 Sq.Mts in Sy.No.190, consisting with two(2) rooms, situated at Allam Thota Bhavi, Begumpet, under GHMC, Balanagar Mandal, R.R.Districtand obstructing for raising of temporary fencing for protection of land from the land grabbers by acting under the influence of respondents No.4 and 5 and calling the petitioners to Begumpet police station frequently without involvement of the petitioners in any criminal case, as illegal, arbitrary, bad and violation of articles of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment over their open land admeasuring 2860 Sq.Yards or 2391.33 Sq.Mts in Sy.No.190, consisting with two(2) room situated at Allam Thota Bhavi, Begumpet, under GHMC, Balanagar Mandal, R.R District in any manner henceforth and to pass…”
2. None for the petitioners.
3. Heard Mr.D.Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents No.1 to 3 and Mr.Pundla Gangadhar, learned counsel representing Mr. M.P.Chandramouli, learned counsel for unofficial respondents No.4 and 5.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that the allegation made by the petitioners that the respondents/police authorities are interfering with their possession and enjoyment of the land at the instance of the unofficial respondents is wholly baseless and devoid of substance. He further submits that the respondents/police authorities are acting strictly within the framework of law and that no action amounting to interference has been undertaken. Accordingly, he prays for dismissal of the writ petition.
5. Learned counsel for the unofficial respondents submits that the unofficial respondents have no involvement whatsoever with the allegations made in the writ petition and that the averments against them are unfounded.
6. I have perused the material available on record.
7. Having regard to the petitioners’ assertion in the affidavit that the respondents/police authorities are interfering with their possession of the subject land, and considering the stand of the respondents/police authorities as well as the well-recognized limitations on police intervention in civil disputes, the respondents/police authorities are directed to refrain from interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioners over the property in question, except strictly in accordance with law and by following due process.
8. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________ N.TUKARAMJI, J Date: 11.11.2025
CHS
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No. 14501 OF 2018 Date: 11.11.2025 CHS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.