O R D E R:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-

“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the in action of the respondents in taking any action against the respondents 6 and 7 on the complaint given by the petitioner on 12-4-2018 in respect of the property of an extent of Ac.0.34 guntas situated in Sy. No. 78 Part of Saheb Nagar Khurd Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District abetting to the National High Way No. 9 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and unsustainable and is in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 21 and the guarantee under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India apart from being in violation of the principles of natural justice and fair play and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 to take action against respondents 6 and 7 and others for demolishing the compound wall and direct them to protect the property from being encroached by respondents 6 and 7 and any third parties for violating the orders passed by this Honourable High Court and pass......”

2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

3. I have heard Mr.D.Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that, based on the petitioner’s report dated 12.04.2018, Crime No. 318 of 2018 was registered. However, after due investigation, a final report classifying the matter as “civil in nature” was filed on 27.08.2018 before the VII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Hayathnagar. Thus, nothing further remains for adjudication, and dismissal of the petition is sought.

5. I have perused the material on record.

6. Having regard to the relief sought by the petitioner, the developments reported by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, and the fact that the respondent police authorities have taken appropriate action within their domain, this Court is of the considered view that nothing further remains for consideration in this matter.

7. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

__________________ N.TUKARAMJI, J