SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 38646

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
Sri A. Krishnam Raju – Appellant
Versus
SPL Infrastructure – Respondent


THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3585 OF 2025 Mr. S.Ram Babu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

ORDER:

1. The Civil Revision Petition arises out of an order dated 11.02.2025 in I.A.No.1525 of 2024 in O.S.No.162 of 2022 passed by the VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at Kukatpally, filed by the petitioners/defendants in the suit for sending the suit Promissory Note to Government Mint, Nasik for examination of the revenue stamp.

2. The petitioners before this Court are the defendants in the said suit filed by the respondent for recovery of money.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/defendants has made his submissions. According to counsel, the defendants have disputed the Promissory Note at all relevant points of time. Counsel submits that the Promissory Note form the basis of the suit filed for recovery of money. Counsel further submits that contrary to the recording in the impugned order, the defendants also took the point of the Promissory Note being a disputed document in the written statement.

4. I have considered the reasons given by the Trial Court for dismissing the petitioners I.A. for s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top