SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 38668

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
Smt. Enaganti Aruna – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI

COMMON ORDER:

In both of these writ petitions, the common grievance is that the unofficial respondents i.e., respondent No.7 in W.P.No.7359 of 2024 (who is respondent No.5 in W.P.No.31156 of 2025), is making construction without obtaining any permission from the authorities.

2. Learned Standing Counsel for the Gram Panchayat has relied upon the averments made in the counter affidavit.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the unofficial respondent No.7 (who is respondent No.5 in W.P.No.31156 of 2025) has filed before this Court the copies of the building application submitted by her on 14.11.2024 and stated that the same has neither been accepted nor rejected and it is still being shown as pending and under the deeming provision under Section 114(3) of the Act, the respondent No.7 (who is respondent No.5 in W.P.No.31156 of 2025) has started the construction, but on receipt of the impugned notice, the construction has been stopped. It is shown from the status of the building application, that it is shown as “under process”.

4. In view of the above and in order to resolve the issue, this Court directs the official respondents to consider the building

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top