SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 38704

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Shaik Sajid – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TELANGANA – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION No.13732 OF 2025

ORDER

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to

3 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.1042 of 2021 on the file of learned I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nizamabad, registered for the offence under Section 353 read with 34 I.P.C.

2. Heard Sri MD. Jameel Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. S. Madhavi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the allegations in the complaint do not attract the ingredients under Section 353 of I.P.C. and that the petitioners are falsely implicated in the present case. He, therefore, prayed to quash the proceedings in the present C.C. against the petitioners herein.

4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners have intentionally obstructed the duties of a public servant and thus, the ingredients under Section 353 of I.P.C. very much attract against the petitioners herein. She, therefore, prayed to dismiss the Criminal Petition.

5. Perused the record.

6. The contents of the complaint do point out that on 19

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top