THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY FAMILY COURT APPEAL Nos.150 and 129 of 2014 and 246 of 2019

COMMON JUDGMENT:

(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Lakshman)

Heard Mr.Ahmed Ehtesham Kawkab, learned counsel for the appellant/husband and Mr.Shaikh Mohammed Rizwan Akhtar, learned counsel for the respondent/wife.

2. In all the three appeals, appellant is the husband and respondent is the wife. The marriage of the appellant with the respondent was performed on 04.11.2011 as per Hindu Rites and Customs. It is an arranged marriage. It is the specific contention of the appellant/husband that immediately after the marriage, respondent joined his company, but not accepted to have consummation of marriage on the very first night. On the intervention of the elders and well-wishers, the same was performed later on. Further, without the knowledge of the appellant, respondent got aborted the pregnancy. Respondent used to harass the appellant without cooperating him and not attending the house hold works. She used to quarrel on each and every petty matter without having any reason.

3. Respondent left the house of the appellant in his absence to her parents