SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 38815

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Sadabathula Dasharatham – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Siraj Ahmed – Respondent


THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

ORDER

1. The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the Order passed in I.A.No.302 of 2021 in OS No.9 of 2017 by the learned Junior Civil Judge -Cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Korutla, Jagtial District in dismissing the application filed for appointment of Advocate Commissioner vide order dated 04.07.2022.

2. Petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondents are the defendant Nos.1 to 4 in the suit vide OS.No.9 of 2017.

3.1. Petitioner has filed I.A.No.302 of 2021 under Order 26 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to fix the boundaries of suit Survey No.798 with the help of Mandal Surveyor or any other Superior Officer.

3.2. It is stated in the affidavit in IA.No.302 of 2021 that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the open land admeasuring Ac.00-09 guntas in Survey No.798/అ, situated at Korutla Shivaru and within the limits of Korutla Revenue Mandal, Jagtial District and the respondents-defendants without having right, title or possession over the suit schedule land, interfered in his possession, which compelled him to file a su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top