SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 38953

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
M. Vachala – Appellant
Versus
Sri Krishna Agarwal and Another – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.218 of 2021

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/claim petitioner assailing the order dated 29.09.2020 in E.A.S.R.No.1849 of 2016 in E.P.No.12 of 2015 in O.S.No.13 of 2005 passed by the learned V Additional District Judge, Kothagudem.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/claim petitioner and learned counsel for respondent No.1. Notice sent to respondent No.2 returned unserved with an endorsement insufficient address.

Perused the record.

3. The brief facts of the case in a nutshell are that the petitioner herein filed an application under Order XXI Rule 58 of CPC, seeking to declare the claim petitioner as one of the share holders of the E.P. schedule property. Admittedly, the E.P.No.12 of 2015 was filed by the respondent No.1/decree holder herein, seeking relief under Order XXI Rule 32 of CPC, seeking a direction to Judgment-Debtor to execute a regular sale deed in favour of decree-holder/plaintiff at his costs, after measuring the property, failing which the decree-holder will execute the registered sale

deed through process of this Court after getting E.P. schedule property meas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top