6THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.1627 of 2023

ORDER

This writ petition is filed for the following prayer:

“…to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.4 and 5 in making efforts to interfering with construction activity of Petitioner Plot No.1/A, admeasuring 150 Sq yards or 125.0 Sq mts in Sy.No.103/part, situated at Amangal, Hayathnagar village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without issuing any notice and without following due process of law, is as illegal, arbitrary, and violation of principles of natural justice and also violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently directs the respondents not interfere with the construction activity of the petitioner property in Plot No.1/A admeasuring 150 Sq yards or 125.0 Sq mts in Sy.No.103/part, situated at Amangal, Hayathnagar village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District…”

2. Heard Sri K.Venkataramanaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Ms.Kanyakumari, learned counsel representing Sri Srinivasa Rao Pachwa, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, appearing for respondent No.5.

Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner purchased the plot No.1/A, admeasuring 150 Sq.yds or 125 Sq mts in Sy.No.103/part, situated Amangal, Hayathnagar Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District though a registered sale deed vide Doc No.5931/2013, dated 30.09.2013 before the SRO, Hyderabad East. After purchase of the said property, the petitioner applied for regularization of the property and the same is approved by the concerned authority on 05.07.2017 and obtained building permission to construct stilt + 2 upper floors. Accordingly, the petitioner started construction in the month of December, 2022. On 23.12.2022 and 05.01.2023 respondent No.4 came to his property and tried to dispossess him from the property stating that the property belongs to the Government. Therefore, he seeks indulgence of this Court to direct the respondent authorities.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue seeks to pass appropriate orders.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and upon perusal of the material placed on record, this Court without making any observations on the merits or demerits of the case on the aspect of possession of the property, deems it appropriate to direct the respondent authorities to strictly follow the procedure contemplated under law by issuing necessary notice to the petitioner if so warranted and take appropriate action in accordance with law.

6. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

___________________________

JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL Date: 03.11.2025 pld