HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33039 OF 2025 ORDER : (ORAL)

Heard Mr. V.Durga Nageshwar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Srinivas Rao Pachwa, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, appearing for respondent No.2; and perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of the subject property bearing H.No.3-4-1/2/A, admeasuring 151 square yards in Survey No.77, situated at Ramanthapur, Uppal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. The petitioner had been residing in Qatar. Neither the petitioner nor any person on his behalf has sold the subject property to respondent No.3. However, in the month of March 2025, while the petitioner was staying in Qatar, respondent No.3 demolished the house of the petitioner by throwing away her household articles; respondent No.3 also dumped her material in the month of March 2025 and started illegal and unauthorized construction in the subject property. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner lodged complaint dated 27.06.2025 before the concerned Police Station and also lodged complaint with respondent No.2 on 06.08.2025 to take action against respondent No.3 regarding the unauthorized construction, however, no action has been initiated till date. As there is inordinate delay on the part of respondent No.2 in disposing of the representations/ complaints of the petitioner, she is constrained to approach this Court.

3. Learned Standing Counsel for GHMC submitted that appropriate action will be taken on the representations/complaints of the petitioner dated 27.06.2025 and 06.08.2025 in accordance with law.

4. Recording the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to consider representations/complaints of the petitioner dated 27.06.2025 and 06.08.2025 made against respondent No.3 regarding illegal and unauthorized construction undertaken by him in respect of the property bearing H.No.3-4-1/2/A, admeasuring 151 square yards in Survey No.77, situated at Ramanthapur, Uppal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, by giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and respondent No.3, and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. As the order is passed without entering into the merits of the case, notice to respondent No.3 is dispensed with. However if, respondent No.3 is, in any way, aggrieved by this order, he is at liberty to approach this Court seeking for modification of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, stand closed.

_______________________

B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J October 31, 2025

NOTE: Issue C.C. today

(BO) RRK