THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.29652 of 2025

ORDER :

The present writ petition is filed by the petitioner under Article

226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 and respondent No.5 in not considering the representations of the petitioner dated 12.03.2025, 19.03.2025, 09.04.2025 and 12.05.2025 and the Bhu Bharathi Application dated 21.06.2025 (Appl. No. RS2500481706) and to direct the respondents to consider the above said representations and conduct an enquiry, rectify the revenue records and incorporate the petitioner’s name in respect of land measuring Ac.0-21 gts., out of Ac.0-24 gts., in Sy.No.272AA, Koheda Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy District and further restrain registration of any transaction concerning the said land pending such correction and disposal of this writ petition.

2. Heard Sri D.Aniketh Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of learned Government Pleader for Revenue Sri K.Muralidhar Reddy.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition assails the inaction of respondents No.2 to 5 in failing to consider the petitioner’s representations dated 12.03.2025, 19.03.2025, 09.04.2025, 12.05.2025 and the Bhu Bharathi Application dated 21.06.2025 vide Application No.RS2500481706, seeking enquiry, rectification of revenue records and incorporation of the petitioner’s name in respect of land measuring Ac.0-21 gts out of Ac.0-24 gts., in Sy.No.272AA of Koheda Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy District and to restrain registration of any transactions relating thereto. The petitioner, absolute owner and possessor of Ac.0-24 gts in Sy.No.272AA and Ac.0-05 gts in Sy.No.273 by virtue of a registered gift deed dated 04.03.2022 executed by his mother, Smt. Pujari Mangamma, discovered that without notice or consent, an extent of Ac.0-21 gts., from his holding had been unauthorisedly deducted and converted to non-agricultural use. Despite multiple representations and an application under the Bhu Bharathi Portal, the respondents have failed to initiate enquiry or restore the correct entries.

(a) The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that such inaction is illegal, arbitrary and violative of his property rights, warranting this Court’s intervention to direct the respondents to consider the aforesaid representations, conduct due enquiry, correct the revenue records and incorporate his name for the rightful extent, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue submits that the petitioner has already availed remedies under the Bhu Bharathi system and that the competent revenue authorities are empowered to examine and rectify such grievances through prescribed administrative procedures. It is therefore contended that the petitioner may be directed to make a fresh, comprehensive application before the concerned authority, furnishing all relevant documents, whereupon the same shall be considered in accordance with law.

5. In view of the above submissions and particularly the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner that they have already submitted an application under the provisions of Bhu-Bharati, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the revenue authorities to examine and consider the request/application of the petitioner if it is found in order and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law by issuing notices to all the concerned and effected parties and affording them an opportunity of being heard as expeditiously as possible.

6. With the above observations, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ E.V.VENUGOPAL, J Dated : 31-