THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY F.C.A. No.221 of 2014

JUDGMENT:

(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Lakshman)

Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant and respondent. We have perused the record.

2. As observed by us on 09.10.2025, notice sent to the respondent is returned as un-served with an endorsement no such person is residing at the address mentioned. Sending notice to the respondent to the address available is sufficient in terms of Section 27 of the General Clauses Act.

3. Appellant is the husband and respondent is the wife. Appellant filed a petition under Section 13(1)(a) of Hindu Marriage Act, vide FCOP No.1538 of 2010 against respondent seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty. Vide impugned order dated 03.12.2014, learned the Judge, Additional Family Court, at Hyderabad, dismissed the said petition. Aggrieved by the said order, appellant preferred the present appeal.

4. The marriage of the appellant with the respondent was solemnized on 02.07.1998 as per Hindu Rites and Customs. It is an arranged marriage.

5. According to the appellant, the said marriage was performed in a simple manner