SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 39946

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Rajashekar Reddy @ Yerva Rajashekar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 10463/2025



THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA I.A.Nos.3 AND 4 OF 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.10463 OF 2025

COMMON ORDER

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to

4 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.37 of 2025 on the file of learned Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dubbak, registered for the offences under Section 498A of I.P.C. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. Heard Sri Nageshwar Rao Pujari, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State and Ms. Anuradha Cherukuri, learned counsel for respondent No.2.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners- accused Nos.1 to 4 as well as respondent No.2-de facto complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed to permit respondent No.2 to compound the offences and to record the compromise.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petition.

5. Perused the affidavit filed by the de facto complainant in I.A.No.3 of 2025, which discloses that he has willingly consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee, vide orders, dated 19.08.2025 and 26.09.2025, passed by this Court.

6. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Committee has identified the parties and submitted reports, dated 29.08.2025 and 14.10.2025, stating that the parties were identified and they have wilfully and without any coercion entered into compromise.

7. In view of the above, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.37 of 2025 on the file of learned Junior Civil Judge-cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dubbak, against the petitioners- accused Nos.1 to 4 are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners- accused Nos.1 to 4 paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates’ Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry.

Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.

____________________________ JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Date: 27-10-2025.

NOTE:

Registry is directed to upload/supply certified copy of the order only after payment of above said amount.

B/o.MD

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top