SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 40069

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
RAYAKANTI GANGADHAR – Appellant
Versus
A.NARAYANA AND ANR – Respondent


THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

JUDGMENT:

1. This appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘MV Act’) assailing the award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (V Additional District Judge) (Fast Track Court) at Nizamabad (for short ‘Tribunal’), in O.P.No.166 of

2005 dated 22.04.2008.

2. Appellant herein is the petitioner and respondent Nos.1 and

2 herein are the respondents before the Tribunal.

3. Appellant - petitioner has filed an application under Section 166(1)(a) of the MV Act and Rule 455 of the A.P.Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, claiming compensation of Rs.24,20,000/- but restricted his claim to Rs.2,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 24% per annum payable by the respondent Nos.1 and 2 jointly and severally.

4. On 25.09.2002 the appellant - petitioner along with others were travelling in the auto rickshaw bearing No.AP-1-U-175 and they reached Mopal village shivar at about 03.00 p.m., the driver of the tractor bearing No.AP-23-T-8655 drove the same in a rash and negligent manner, came from behind and dashed the auto rickshaw, due to which the auto rickshaw turned turtle. The appellant - petitioner and other inmates of the auto r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top