SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 40302

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
B.Naganna – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police – Respondent


ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:

“…to issue an order, direction or writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in not taking steps to expeditiously investigate Cr.No.69 of 2014 registered at Hanwada Police Station, Mahabubnagar district even after six months is arbitrary, unlawful and an act of dereliction of duty and further direct the first and second respondents to complete the investigation expeditiously and fairly, and to pass…”

2. Heard Smt. Vasudha Nagaraj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sridhar Bhuvanagiri, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents.

3. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for home submitted that pursuant to the registration of the said Crime No.69 of 2014 dated 15.04.2014, investigation into the said crime was already conducted and a final report dated 25.10.2014, under Section 173 of Cr.P.C. has also been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Mahabubnagar and the said final report reveals that the crime is false.

4. Learn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top