*THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO +W.P. Nos.9858 AND 10814 OF 2024 % 23-10-2025 # V. Pradeep and another ….petitioners Vs.

$ State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry, Dairy-II Department, Hyderabad and others …. Respondents !Counsel for the petitioner (in both W.Ps) : Sri Chikkudu Prabhakar Counsel for the Respondent No.1 (in both W.Ps) : G.P for Animal Husbandry Counsel for respondent No.2 (in both W.Ps) : Sri Bharath Reddy Bommineni

? Cases referred:

1. 2006 (4) SCC 1 2. 2019 SCC 2649 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA HYDERABAD * * * *

W.P. Nos.9858 AND 10814 OF 2024 Between:

V. Pradeep and another ….petitioners Vs.

State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry, Dairy-II Department, Hyderabad and others … Respondents ORDER PRONOUNCED ON: 23.10.2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments? : Yes

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Marked to Law Reporters/Journals? : Yes

3. Whether His Lordship wishes to see the fair copy of the Judgment? : Yes _____________________________________ NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO, J HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION Nos. 9858 AND 10814 OF 2024

COMMON ORDER:

W.P. No.9858 of 2024 is filed for the following relief: “…to declare action of respondents in non-regularizing the services of the petitioner as Jr. Engineer (Electrical)/Manager, in spite of petitioner legally appointed as Jr. Engineer (Electrical)/Manager and completed 13 years of service and issued an impugned Proceedings No.13/Per.1/B1/2020, dated: 05.05.2023 as an illegal, unilateral and against the Regulation 22 of the Telangana Dairy Development Co-operative Federation, 1976 and in violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of Article 14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and against to the catena of Judgments of an Apex Court and this Hon'ble Court, and set aside the same and consequently, direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner with consequential benefits and pass…”

W.P. No.10814 of 2024 is filed for the following relief:

“….to declare the action of respondents in non-regularizing the services of the petitioner as Manager (Production & Procurement), in spite of petitioner legally appointed as Manager (Production & Procurement) and completed 16½ years service and the 2nd respondent issued an impugned Proceedings by rejecting the regularization of the service of the petitioner vide Proceedings No.14/Per.1/B1/2020, dated: 30.09.2023 as an illegal and against the Regulations of the Telangana Dairy Development Employees Co-operative Federation, 1976 and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Article 14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and against the catena of Judgments of an Apex Court and this Hon'ble Court and set aside the same and consequently, direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner as Manager (Production & Procurement) in the respondents Organization with consequential benefits and pass….”

2. Since the issue involved in these Writ Petitions is identical, these two Writ Petitions are disposed of by this Common Order.

3. Heard Sri Chikkudu Prabhakar, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Animal Husbandry, appearing for respondent No.1, and Sri Bharath Reddy Bommineni, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana Dairy Development Co-operative Federation Ltd., appearing for the respondent No.2.

4. For the sake of convenience, the facts in WP No.9858 of 2024 are discussed hereunder:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits as follows: That the petitioner applied for the post of Jr.

Engineer (electrical) in pursuance of the Notification issued by the 2nd respondent vide Notification No.18/Per.I/B1/10, dated 20.10.2010. He appeared the written examination on 23.01.2011 and also attended the interview on 04.03.2011. After completi