THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.31850 of 2025

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-

“(i)… Issue a Writ particularly in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in continuing to show Petitioners' Plots 56, 60, 61 and 62 land in Sy.No. 233/24, 233/25 and 233/26 of Nizampet village, Qutubullapur Mandal, erstwhile Ranga Reddy District now in Medchal Malkajgiri District as "Government/assigned land" despite the judgment in W.P.No.17704 of 2012 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional;

ii) Direct the Respondents to forthwith de-notify/delete the Petitioners' land from the list of Government/assigned lands and mutate them in the name of the petitioners with absolute ownership.

iii) pass any order or orders or direction that this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. Heard Mr.G.Trinadha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.H.Somaiah Ezra Shastry, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Ms.Indraja, learned counsel representing Mr.Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.5. Perused the record.

3. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had filed a representation dated 12.04.2025 before respondent No.2 seeking implementation of the order dated 10.07.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.17704 of 2012. But the said representation is kept pending till date. Therefore, he seeks direction to respondent No.2 to dispose of the said representation.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment contends that the petitioner, instead of availing appropriate remedy for implementation of the order dated 10.07.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.17704 of 2012, rushed to this Court by filing the present Writ Petition. Therefore, he seeks to dismiss this Writ Petition.

5. A perusal of the record shows that except filing the postal receipts showing that the petitioner sent representation to respondent No.2, nothing is on record to show that the said representation is acknowledged by respondent No.2.

6. Having regard to the submissions of both the learned counsel and on perusal of the material available on record, this Court without making any observations on the merits or demerits of the case, is inclined to grant liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedies as available under law.

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.

_____________________ E.V.VENUGOPAL, J

23.10.2025

ESP

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.31850 of 2025

23.10.2025 ESP