SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 40422

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
MENDU BHARATHI – Appellant
Versus
KODIRIPAKA SAMBA MURTHY – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5803 of 2015

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the Docket Order dated 28.10.2015 in O.S.No.78 of 2014 passed by the learned 1st Additional District Judge, Warangal.

2. Heard Sri.B.Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant and Smt.S.A.V.Ratnam, learned counsel for respondent/plaintiff. Perused the record.

3. The facts of the case in a nutshell are that PW1 was examined and Exs.A1 to A5 were marked. During the course of marking of the said documents, as the respondent/plaintiff relied upon the original agreement of sale dated 06.11.2013 and the same was engrossed on Rs.100/- Indian Non-Judicial Stamp executed by the petitioner/defendant in favour of the respondent/plaintiff and during the course of marking of the said documents an objection was raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant for marking the documents stating that the agreement of sale, requires registration and payment of stamp duty and the document is engraved on insufficient stamp. The learned Judge, having heard both sides held that the objection raised by the learned counsel for the peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top