SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 40426

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
M Venkatesh Goud – Appellant
Versus
Deepak Kumar – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE P.SAM KOSHY CI VI L REVI SI ON PETI TI ON No.2468 of 2025

ORDER:

The instant Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the docket order dated 28.02.2025, in I.A.No.1817 of 2024 in O.S.No.157 of 2014 (renumbered as O.S.No.47 of 2021), passed by the VI Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally (for short, ‘the impugned order’)

2. Heard Mr. P. Vishnu Vardhan Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr. Karra V.V.S.N.Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner; and Ms.

Challa Apoorva Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.3.

3. Vide the impugned order; the Trial Court dismissed the I.A.No.1817 of 2024 filed by the petitioner under Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) seeking to reopen the petitioner’s evidence for further marking of certain documents.

4. The brief facts of the case, are that, the petitioner filed a suit for perpetual injunction against the respondents. The contention of the petitioner was that the respondents are trying to interfere with the construction works initiated by the petitioner. The Trial Court initially granted an order of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top