SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 40471

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
The Principal Secretary (Revenue) – Appellant
Versus
Dost M.Oosman – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

JUDGMENT:

Challenging the judgment and decree dated

30.08.2017 passed in O.S.No.126 of 2015 by the learned Judge, Family Court - cum - VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, the present Appeal Suit is filed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff had filed a suit seeking perpetual injunction against the defendants to restrain them from interfering with his possession and enjoyment of the schedule property measuring Ac.14.10 guntas in Sy.No.135 of Rudraram village, Patancheru Mandal stating that his father, late Ghouse Mohd. Oosman, was the owner of extensive lands in Sy.Nos.135 to 154, including Komati Kunta situated in Sy.No.135, which had been dug by the previous pattadar and purchased along with the land in 1950. After the death of his father, the plaintiff and his family succeeded the property and declared their holdings under land ceiling proceedings, wherein no surplus land was declared. He asserted that Komati Kunta was a private kunta forming part of their patta land, which was earlier used for agriculture and cattle but had become polluted due to industrial influence. Consequently, the family deci

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top