SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 40548

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
Kareti Venkata Subba Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 4933/2020



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.4933 and 5573 of 2020

COMMON ORDER:

Criminal Petition No.4933 of 2020 is filed by the petitioner/accused No.8 and Criminal Petition No.5573 of 2020 is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.5, 7 and 9 seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.184 of 2020 of Miryalguda II Town Police Station, Nalgonda District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 447 and 506 read with

34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘the IPC’).

1.1. As both the criminal petitions arise out of Crime No.184 of 2020 of Miryalguda II Town Police Station, Nalgonda District, both petitions are clubbed together and being disposed of the same by way of a common order.

2. Brief facts of the case:

The husband of respondent No.2, Mandula Saidulu, purchased land admeasuring Ac.4.00 guntas in Survey No. 956, situated at Bangarugadda, in the year 1996, from one Nerella Pappaiah and the said Saidulu subsequently land was divided into plots and sold several plots through Nerella Pappaiah and his sons and retained one plot for construction of a house. In the year 2002, Saidulu passed away and thereafter Nerella Bhiksham, son of Pappaiah, registered an extent of 534 square yards in favour of the daughter of Saidulu, namely, Mandula Harika, under Document No. 2732 of 2007. The second respondent alleged that the petitioners, namely Boddu Swathi Bantu Swathi, Parshanaboina Laxman, Mohammed Sajid Khan, and Saraswathi Gayathri Devi, along with others, created false and fabricated documents and filed a civil suit in 2015 based on such documents. It was further alleged that during 2011 and 2012, Nerella Laxmi and Nerella Karuna, the daughter-in-laws of Nerella Pappaiah, amended revenue records (Sl. No. 110) in collusion with revenue officials. The complaint also alleged that in 2015, several illegal sale transactions were executed, Document No. 542/2015 in favour of Nethi Venkateshwarlu (Ac. 0.30 gts). Document No. 1256/2015 in favour of Boddu Swathi @ Bantu Swathi (Ac. 0.10 gts). Document No. 543/2015 in favour of Kareti Venkatasubba Reddy (Ac. 1.00 gts). Document No. 1257/2015 in favour of Mohammed Sajid Khan (Ac. 0.05 gts), and Document No. 1258/2015 in favour of Saraswathi Gayathri (Ac. 0.02 gts), for which Chilukuri Balakrishna, Vanam Ramakrishna, and Dheeravath. Taurya acted as witnesses. The second respondent submitted a representation to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalguda, vide Letter No D/3814/2015 dated 29-12-2016, and in January 2017, the RDO replied that the land had been plotted since 1996, and that Nerella Laxmi and Nerella Karuna had no ownership rights. Despite this, on 17.09.2020, the alleged purchasers unlawfully entered the land and demanded money from the complainant to permit her entry. Consequently, the second respondent filed a complaint on 02.10.2020 seeking action against the accused. Basing on the above said complaint, Crime No.184 of 2020 is registered, wherein the petitioners were arrayed as accused Nos.5 and 7 to 9 and they filed the present criminal petitions seeking to quash the crime against them.

3. Heard Mr. C. Damodar Reddy, learned Senior Counsel, representing Mr. C. Ruthwik Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl.P.No.4933 of 2020, Mr. Krishna Kalyan, learned counsel, representing Mr. K. Venumadhav, learned counsel for the petitioners in Crl.P.No.5573 of 2020, Mr. Kiran Palakurthy, learned counsel, representing Ms.Srilatha Palakurthy, learned counsel for respondent No.2 in Crl.P.No.4933 of 2020 and Mr. M. Vivekananda Reddy, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1 State in both the criminal petitions.

4. Submissions of learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner in Crl.P.No.4933 of 2020:

4.1. Learned Senior Counsel submitted that the petitioner/accused No.8 had purchased the property to an extent of Ac.1.00 gts. in Sy.No.956 of Miryalguda Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, through registered sale deed bearing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top