IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.20909 OF 2025 Between Vadthya Ramulu ……...Petitioner vs.

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Chief Secreatary, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad and others ……. Respondents DATE OF ORDER PASSED: 17.10.2025 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL.

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

1 Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes/No

2 Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals Yes/No

3 Whether His Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment? Yes/No _________________________

JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT: HYDERABAD CORAM:

* HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN + WRIT PETITION No.20909 OF 2025 % Delivered on: 17-10-2025 Between # Vadthya Ramulu .. Petitioner Vs.

$ The State of Telangana Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents ! For Petitioner Dr. Vijayalakshmi, Ld.counsel For Respondents Sri T.Rajinikanth Reddy, Ld.

Additional Advocate General, Ld. Govt.Pleader for Home, Sri D.Narender Naik, Standing Counsel, Sri Vadeendra Joshi, Ld. counsel, < Gist ---- > Head Note ----

? Cases Referred 1. AIR 1958 SC 538

2. AIR 1969 SC 215 3. (2016) 11 SCC 31 4. (2013) 5 SCC 427

5. (2001) 4 ALD 129 SC, 6. (2023) 12 SCC 401

7. 2003 SCC Online AP 87

8. 1973 SCC Online DEL 223

9. 1979 SCC Online Raj 60

10. 1982 SCC Online Ker 91

11. (2019) 15 SCC 613

12.2001 (4) ALD 56 (DB)

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.20909 OF 2025

ORDER

Heard Dr. Vijayalakshmi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri T. Rajinikanth Reddy, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 6, Learned Govt.Pleader for Home, Sri D.Narender Naik, Standing Counsel appearing for Respondent No.8, Sri Vadeendra Joshi, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.9 to 12.

2. The petitioner is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac 10-17 guntas in Sy.Nos. 194 and 195 situated at Nagaram Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. According to him, his father late Sri Jamala, belongs to Scheduled Tribe (ST) Community, purchased the above said land from the original owner Sri Nawab Mohd. Haji Khan in the year 1964. During the lifetime, his father had executed a registered gift settlement deed vide document No.23750 of 2019, dated 08.10.2019 in favour of the petitioner in respect of land admeasuring Ac.5.00 guntas out of Ac.10.17guntas. Since then, he is in physical possession and enjoyment of the said property. There is standing crop in the said property. His name was also entered in the revenue record. E-pattadar passbook and title deed was also issued in his favour. His father died on 07.10.2020.

3. While the petitioner carrying on agricultural operations, Sri K. Chavli and others interfered with his possession over the subject property. Therefore, he has filed a suit in O.S. No.724 of 2022 against the said K.Chavli and others for permanent injunction. Along with the said suit, he has also filed I.A.No.881 of 2022 seeking temporary injunction. Vide order dated 30.04.2024, learned XI Additional District Judge, at Ranga Reddy District, vide order dated 30.04.2024, dismissed the said petition. Therefore, he has preferred an appeal vide CMA No.452 of 2024. Vide order dated 28.11.2024, the same was allowed granting injunction in favour of the petitioner till disposal of the suit.

4. Later the suit was transferred to the Additional District Court, Ibrahimpatnam and re-numbered as O.S. 730 of 2024 and the same is pending. Despite the injunction order dated 28.11.2024 granted in C.M.A No.452 of 2024, the defendant in the said suit interfered with the possession of the petitioner over the suit scheduled property. Therefore, he has filed I.A. No 441 of 2025 seeking police aid against

6^th respondent. Vide order dated 01.05.2025, the trial Court granted police aid to the petitioner. The same has not been im