SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 40781

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Gadi Praveen Kumar, J
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Badavath Balkishan – Respondent
M.A.C.M.A. Nos.22 and 922 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A. Ramakrishna Reddy
For the Respondents: A. Rajashekar Reddy, S. Surender Reddy

An insurer is not liable to indemnify a third-party claim if it establishes with credible contemporaneous records that no valid insurance policy exists, effectively shifting the evidentiary burden to the claimant to prove the policy's authenticity when the insurer alleges the document is fabricated.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 149 and 168 - Insurance policy - Allegation of fake/fabricated policy - Burden of proof - Where an insurer provides credible evidence to show that the insurance policy relied upon by the claimant is not issued by them, the burden shifts to the claimant to prove the authenticity of the document - Third-party risk liability does not arise where no contract of insurance exists at all.

(B) Evidence - Burden of proof - Section 106, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - A litigant cannot be required to prove a negative fact (that they did not issue a specific policy) when the insurer has produced official contemporaneous records proving non-existence of such policy.

Facts of the case:
The appellant insurance company challenged the orders of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal which had fastened liability on them for compensation related to an accident involving an oil tanker. The appellant claimed that the insurance policy produced by the claimants was fake/fabricated and had not been issued by the company. Evidence was led by the insurer showing the policy number was inconsistent with their database and issuance registers.

Findings of Court:
The insurance company successfully demonstrated that the policy produced by the claimants was not issued by them, being devoid of standard authentication marks and inconsistent with the company's records. Consequently, the finding of the lower court that the insurer is liable is set aside.

Issues: Whether the appellant Insurance Company is liable to provide compensation when the insurance policy relied upon by the claimants is allegedly fake and fabricated.

Ratio Decidendi: The legal liability of an insurer to pay compensation is contingent on the existence of a valid contract of insurance. Once an insurer presents credible evidence (records/protests) casting doubt on the genuineness of a policy, the burden lies on the claimant to prove its authenticity; the insurer cannot be made liable for an unproven/non-existent contract.

Result: Appeals allowed.

Table of Content
1. overview of claims, accident circumstances, and insurance disputes. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. parties' contentions regarding policy existence and insurance liability. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
3. evaluation of evidence regarding fake insurance policy documentation. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
4. burden of proof concerning negative facts and contractual existence. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)
5. final reasoning and outcome regarding setting aside lower tribunal orders. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers

may be allowed to see the Judgments? : Yes

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be

Marked to Law Reporters/Journals? : Yes

3. Whether His Lordship wishes to

see the fair copy of the Judgment? : Yes

___________________________

GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, J

COMMON JUDGMENT:

Dated 15.10.2025

Between:

IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. ... Appellant

VERSUS

1. Badavath Balkishan and others ... Respondents.

Counsel for Appellant : Sri A.Ramakrishna Reddy

Counsel for Respondents : Sri A.Rajashekar Reddy

Sri S.Surender Reddy

GIST :

HEAD NOTE :

Cases referred :

1. MAC Appeal No.7 to 2020 to 09 to 2020

2. C/FA/4114/2009 dated 28.01.2022

Heard Sri A.Ramakrishna Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri A.Rajashekar Reddy and Sri S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents at length and perused the record.

2. M.A.C.M.A.No.22 of 2024 is filed by the Appellant Insurance Company being aggrieved by the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge at Nizamabad (for short ‘the Tribunal’) in M.V.O.P.No.67 of 2018 dated 03.08.2023 in respect of deceased Badavath Ravi Kumar, who, while travelling along with his friend Sandeep on motor bike, met with an accident with an oil tanker bearing No. AP- 16TD-4511 (crime vehicle), allowing the claim granting compensation of Rs.31,08,500/- along with interest @ 7.5% p.a.

3. M.A.C.M.A.No.922 of 2024 is filed by the appellant Insurance Company being aggrieved by the award dated 29.12.2023 passed in M.V.O.P.No.32 of 2018 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge at Kamareddy in respect of deceased Sandeep, who along with his friend Badavath Ravi Kumar was travelling on a motor cycle met with an accident with an oil tanker bearing No.AP-16TD-4511, allowing the claim granting compensation of Rs.16,55,625/- proportionately along with interest @ 7.5% p.a.

4. Since, the accident occurred on 22.11.2017 at about 2.30 hours where both the deceased while travelling on bike met with an accident by dashing against an oil tanker. Therefore, both these Appeals are clubbed together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

5. The facts leading to file claims by the respective claimants before the respective learned Tribunals are that on 22-11-2017 at about 2.30 hours near Dharma kanta enroute to Nizamabad-Dichpally Main Road, Dichpalli, the deceased Badavath Ravi Kumar along with his friend Sandeep started on their motor bike bearing No.TS-16EN-5541, and in the meantime, the driver of tanker (lorry) bearing No.AP-16TD-4511 parked on the road without taking any precautions or giving any signals, due to which the deceased dashed into the backside of the lorry, as result of which both the deceased sustained grievous injuries and died on the spot.

6. The police of Dichpally registered a case in Cr.No.220 of 2017 under Section 304-A IPC against the driver of the offending vehicle.

7. It was contended before the respective learned Tribunals that the deceased Badavath Ravi Kumar in MACMA No.22/2024 is aged 26 years working as Chemical Engineer in Granules India Limited, Jeedimetla and earning Rs.20,717/-, in which the father, mother and sisters are the claimants before the learned Tribunal in MVOP No.67 of 2018.

8. In respect of MACMA No.922 of 2024, the deceased viz., Badavat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top