THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE NARSI NG RAO NANDI KONDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.2200 OF 2021 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)

Heard Mr. B. Madhusudan, petitioner / party-in-person, and Mr. K. Balakrishna, learned counsel for respondent No.11.

2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:

“The petitioner is most respectfully humbly submits that for the factual backdrop and factual matrix submitted in the writ petition and writ petition miscellaneous petitions, legal position, valid legal grounds, in view of Judgment of Hon’ble Chief Justice of Hon’ble Supreme Court, for reasons submitted above and to respect our holy book in letter and spirit in the interest of justice and fair play, it is humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court, may graciously be pleased”:

1. To allow Writ Petition with Rs 10,00,000 (ten lakhs) exemplary costs on respondents (recoverable from erring officers) for deliberately, willfully, inspired by malice for vested interests dragged the petitioner into this litigation by creating false documents without inherent lack of jurisdiction by playing fraud on the Constitution of India, fraud on court, fraud on the petitioner which was totally avoidable.

2. To quash & set aside Director General (Commercial)-1 order dated 30.08.2016, Deputy Comptroller & Auditor General (Commercial) Order dated 20.11.2017, Comptroller & Auditor General of India Order dated 04.01.2019, Charge Sheet dated 09.04.2015, Hon’ble Tribunal orders dated 03.06.2019, 09.09.2019 etc.

3. To direct R-1 to treat the period of absence of the petitioner with effect from 03.01.2012 onwards till the date of normal retirement as duty for all purposes including seniority, promotion, increment, pension etc as fraud has no existence in the eyes of law as the transfer Order dated 14.12.2011 was suo motu cancelled and merged with the orders dated 30.08.2016, 20.11.2017 04.01.2019 and completely wiped out from existence and the petitioner was unconstitutionally prevented from discharging his duties and to pay his arrears of pay and allowances with effect from 03.01.2012 onwards to till the date of his normal retirement along with interest 36 percent p.a from the date pay and allowances was due till the date of actual payment in accordance with the Rules prescribed by law. It is not out of place to submit here that the then Respondent No-1 (Shri Vinod Rai) had paid cost Rs.5000 and interest @ 10 percent p.a with effect from 23.12.2008 onwards to till the date of actual payment as directed by Hon’ble Tribunal in O.A.No.140 of 2012 vide order dated 18.09.2012.

4. To direct R-1 to pay vindictive damages of Rs.10 crores (recoverable from erring officers) as fraud, lack of integrity of the respondents have no existence in the eyes of law and orders deliberately, willfully passed in fragrant violation of Article 311, 14, 21, 141 etc., of the Constitution of India were null and void and non est in the eyes of law.

5. To direct R-8 i.e. Shri Rajiv Mehrishi Comptroller & Auditor General of India New Delhi to pay Rs. one crore personally from his pay and allowances if this Hon’ble Court convinced that he deliberately, willfully by playing fraud not paid pay and allowances of the petitioner for eight years in violation of Article

311, 21 and 14 of the Constitution of India.

6. To direct R-9 i.e., Shri M.S.Subramanyam, Director General to a minimum amount of Rs.10 lakhs to the petitioner for deliberately, willfully colluding with the other respondents, depicting total lack of integrity etc., if the Hon’ble Chief Justice is convinced that he deliberately, willfully for vested interest not supplied vital fundamental documents in violation of mandatory constitutional provisions of Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India and for submitting misleading and misrepresenting replies befooling judges in our country.

7. To direct R-10 i.e., Ms Rebecca Mathai to pay Rs.one crore personally to the petitioner fr