SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 42356

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Telakapally Chandra Shekhar Sarma – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 25066/2025



HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

ORDER

Heard Mr. B. Vamshidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 6 and Mr. Vedula Srinivas, learned Senior Counsel representing Mrs. Vedula Chitralekha, learned counsel for respondent Nos.7 to 9.

2. CASE OF THE PETITIONERS i) Petitioner No.1 is the husband of petitioner No.2. They are the absolute owners and possessors of agricultural lands admeasuring Acs.1.25 guntas in Survey No.306/A/1, Acs.3.16 guntas in Survey No.306/B, Acs.1.22 guntas in Survey No.306/D, Acs.2.00 guntas in Survey No.306/E, Ac.0.02 guntas in Survey No.307/A, Acs.3.00 guntas in Survey No.307/D, Acs.1.18 guntas in Survey No.307/G, Ac.0.25 guntas in Survey No.307/H/2, making a total extent of Acs.14.24 guntas, situated at Ainapur Village, Komuravelly Mandal, Siddipet District, having purchased the same under registered sale deeds in the year 2004. Since the date of purchase, they are in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said lands. Their names were also mutated in revenue records and pattadar passbooks and title deeds were also issued in their favour. There are standing crops i.e., paddy, mango, guava and banana over the subject lands.

\

ii) When respondent Nos.4 and 5 issued notices dated 11.07.2024 and 30.08.2024 proposing to conduct survey of land in Survey Nos.270 and 304 of the aforesaid Village at the behest of respondent Nos.7 and 8, the petitioners filed a writ petition vide W.P. No.26127 of 2024 to set aside those notices. Vide order dated 21.09.2024, this Court disposed of the said writ petition directing respondent No.5 to consider the objections of the petitioners before proceeding with survey.

iii) Thereafter, respondent No.7 filed a suit vide O.S. No.474 of

2024 for perpetual injunction restraining the petitioners herein from interfering with the suit schedule property admeasuring Ac.0.18 guntas in Survey No.304/B/1, Ac.0.11 guntas in Survey No.270/G/1/1/1 and Ac.0.10 guntas in Survey No.304/1 of the aforesaid Village and the said suit is pending before the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Siddipet. There is no interim injunction in the said suit.

iv) The petitioners herein also filed a suit vide O.S. No.501 of

2024 for perpetual injunction against respondent Nos.7 and 8 in respect of the subject property. Learned trial Court granted interim injunction on 16.10.2024 and the same is being extended from time to time.

v) During pendency of said civil suits, issuance of the aforesaid notices to conduct survey amounts to interference with the disputes pending between the parties and, therefore, the petitioners filed objection petition to the notice dated 20.08.2025 of respondent No.6.

vi) When respondent Nos.7 and 8 also criminally trespassed into the subject lands with JCB and Tractor along with their henchmen and damaged the crop, the petitioners gave a report to the Police, Komuravelli Police Station, who in turn registered a case in Crime No.140 of 2020 against them for the offences under Sections - 329 (3) and 324 (5) read with 3 (5) of BNS on 15.09.2024. On completion of investigation, the police laid charge sheet and the same was taken on file as C.C. No.1030 of 2025, which is pending.

vii) Pursuant to the orders of this Court in the aforesaid writ petition, respondent No.6 had issued notice directing the petitioners to attend survey on 02.12.2024. Challenging the same, petitioner No.1 filed a writ petition vide W.P. No.33496 of 2024. Vide order dated 06.01.2025, this Court disposed of the said writ petition directing the official respondents to conduct survey of lands in Survey Nos.270 and

304 after issuing notices to all the interested/affected parties.

viii) Aggrieved by the said orders in W.P. No.33496 of 2024, petitioner No.1 preferred a writ appeal vide W.A. No.221 of 2025. Vide order dated 29.04.2025, a Division Bench of this Court allowed the said writ appeal setting aside the notice dated 18.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top