SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 45417

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
A.Narasimha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Baba – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

ORDER:

The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order, dated 23.03.2017 passed in I.A.No.285 of 2016 in O.S.No.26 of 2013 by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sanga Reddy, (for short ‘the impugned order’).

2. Vide the impugned order, the trial court after going into the merits of the case and considering the entire oral and documentary evidence placed by the petitioners/plaintiffs has dismissed the petition filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short the C.P.C.), seeking permission of the court to permit the petitioners/plaintiffs to amend the boundaries of the suit schedule property. 3. The suit i.e., O.S.No.26 of 2013 is filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs seeking perpetual injunction against the respondents/defendants contending that the petitioners and the brother of the petitioner had purchased the plaint schedule property admeasuring Ac.0-10 guntas in Sy.No.788 and also residential plot admeasuring 300 square yards under registered sale deed bearing No.2287 of 1981, dated 24.0

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top