SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 47563

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
1Kantam Shekar Kantam Chandra Shekar – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Telangana – Respondent


HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.27780 of 2024

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of respondent No.3 in passing order dated 21.09.2024 in Case No.TW/A1/63/2024 and declaring the action of respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners.

2. Heard Sri Gajanand Chakravarthi, learned counsel for petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent No.4. Perused the record.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners’ mother, Smt. Kantam Laxmi, W/o Narayana, was the owner of a residential house bearing H.No.14-367 in Survey Nos.43, 44, and 45, admeasuring 177.37 square yards, situated at Utnoor Village and Mandal, Adilabad District. The petitioners claim to have inherited the said property and have been in peaceful possession, with their names mutated in the Gram Panchayat records and taxes paid regularly.

4. The grievance of petitioners is that unofficial respondent No.5, relying on alleged fabricated documents, claims to have purchased the property from one Bodukam Shekar on 04.09.2020, who, according to petitioners, has no right, title,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top