SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 49226

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
Munigala Radhika – Appellant
Versus
M. Anand Reddy – Respondent


HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI C.R.P.No.1174 OF 2025

ORDER:

Aggrieved by the order dated 23.12.2024 passed in I.A..No.412 of 2024 in O.S.No.184 of 2015 by the III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the present civil revision petition has been filed.

2. Heard Ms. Samhitha Nimmala, learned counsel representing Sri Vivek Jain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. None appears for the respondents.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners had contended that the petitioners-plaintiffs have filed O.S.No.184 of 2015 for partition against the family members and the 1st respondent-defendant(father). During pendency of the said suit, their father i.e., 1st respondent-defendant expired on 02.09.2020. Thereafter, the petitioners have filed petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151 CPC seeking to condone the delay of 1106 days in filing petition to set aside abatement of suit against the 1st respondent-defendant. Without appreciating any of vide the contentions raised by the petitioners, the trial Court order

23.12.2024 dismissed the said application.

4. Learned counsel had further contended that legal representatives of the 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top