SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 51012

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
Thokala Sudhakar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 10331/2025



THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI AND

COMMON ORDER

The petitioner in W.P.No.10331 of 2025 is challenging the action of the 3rd respondent in not initiating any action in furtherance of the notice dt.01.03.2025 issued by him against the illegal construction undertaken by the 4th respondent, while the petitioner in W.P.No.6163 of 2025, who is the 4th respondent in W.P.No.10331 of 2025, has challenged the action of the 3rd respondent in trying to remove the subject house.

2. After hearing both parties and after going through the counter affidavit filed by the 4th respondent in W.P.No.10331 of 2025, this Court finds that it is on the complaint of the petitioner in W.P.No.10331 of 2025 that the official respondents have visited the house site of the petitioner in W.P.No.6163 of 2025 and have noticed that the said petitioner is making construction in deviation of the sanctioned plan and therefore, they have issued a notice dt.01.03.2025 and the petitioner in W.P.No.6163 of 2025 has approached this Court and obtained an interim direction not to interfere with the construction of the petitioner’s house as per the house construction permission granted on 11.07.2024. The grievance of the petitioner in W.P.No.10331 of 2025 is that in spite of issuance of the notice observing that respondent No.4 has constructed in deviation of sanctioned plan, the official respondents are not taking any further action under the guise of the interim order of this Court.

3. Having gone through the counter affidavit filed by the 3rd respondent in W.P.No.6163 of 2025 to the effect that a notice has already been given and after measurement of the construction made by the 4th respondent in W.P.No.10331 of 2025 it was found that there are deviations in the construction, this Court deems it fit and proper to permit the 4th respondent to submit his explanation within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the Panchayat Secretary of the 3rd respondent Gram Panchayat is directed to consider the said representation and thereafter, after giving a fair opportunity of hearing to all the concerned, to take a decision thereon in accordance with law. Till such time, all the parties are directed to maintain status quo as on today.

4. With the above directions, both the Writ Petitions are disposed of.

No order as to costs.

5. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in these Writ Petitions shall stand closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI Date: 26.06.2025 Svv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top