SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 51111

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Punjala Roja Rani – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda – Respondent
WP 17962/2025



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.17962 of 2025

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the written representation dated 30.01.2025 submitted by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct respondent to return the mortgaged documents (Original Sale deed vide Doc.No.976 of 2001 and 977 of 2001) and other link documents to the petitioner.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.N.V.R.Rajya Lakshmi, learned standing counsel representing Mr.Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for respondent No.3.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that petitioner claims to be absolute owner and possessor of Plot No.66, Sy.No.223 and 224 admeasuring 248 sq.yds., at Sahebnagar Kalan Village, Hayathnagar Revenue Mandal, Ranga Reddy District purchased from its original owner through registered sale deed vide Doc.Nos.976 and 977 of 2001 dated 03.02.2001 and the petitioner’s husband availed overdraft loan from respondent No.1/Bank and at the time of sanction of loan petitioner has deposited the said sale deeds. Thereafter, petitioner has cleared the entire loan amount with respondent No.1/Bank. However, respondent No.1/Bank failed to return the original documents to the petitioner even after several requests and written representation dated 30.01.2025. Questioning the same, the present writ petition is filed.

4. Though various grounds are raised in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer seeking a direction to respondent authorities to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 30.01.2025 in a time bound period.

5. Learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.3 submits that if the said representation is still pending for consideration, the respondent authorities may be 30.01.2025 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

6. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel on either side and without going into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (03) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after giving a fair opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties and communicate the same to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

___________________________________

N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR, J.

Date: 26.06.2025 mrm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top