SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 51157

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
Dr. S. Karnakar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.18197 of 2023

ORDER:

Heard Sri Ch.Ganesh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I representing all the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents on record.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking the prayer as follows:

“…to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the in action of the respondents in not counting the past temporary service rendered by the Petitioner on adhoc basis to reckon same for computation of qualifying service as per G.O.Ms.No.156 Finance and planning (FW. PEN.1) Department, dated 29-04-1983, for the purpose to sanction of pension and Gratuity on eve of retirement of petitioner by not applying principles laid by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Prem Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others in Civil Appeal No.6798 of 2019 and batch dt.02.09.2019, (2019) 10 SCC 516), and in the case of Habib Khan Verses State of Uttarakhand and others in Civil Appeal No.10806 of 2017 and batch dt.23.08.2017, (2019) 10 SCC 542), followed by Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top