HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17783 of 2025

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for following relief: “....to pass an order, direction or a writ particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action on part of the respondents in interfering with his possession in respect of his land admeasuring Ac 8.00 guntas, in Sy.No.339, situated at Puppalguda Village, Gandipet Mandal, RR District, and forcing him to hand over possession of subject lands under the threat of registering false cases, is highly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of right under Article 300 A of the Constitution of India. Consequently, this Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and ownership rights of the petitioner in respect of his the land admeasuring Ac 8.00 guntas, in Sy. No. 339, situated at Puppalguda Village, Gandipet Mandal, RR District in any illegal manner and pass any other order or orders as deemed fit and proper in the circumstance of the case in the interest of justice....”

2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the consent this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.

3. It is stated that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of agricultural land admeasuring Ac.8.00 guntas, in Sy.No.339, situated at Puppalguda Village, Gandipet Mandal, RR District, having acquired the same under a registered assignment deed bearing No.12451 of 1980, dated 31.12.1980 executed by Jitander Raj Bhale Rao, S/o.late Raja Trimbak Raj, appointed by the Supreme Court as Receiver-cum-Commissioner in C.S.No.18 of 1958 vide document No.12451 of 1980, dated 31.12.1980. Thereafter, the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the subject property.

5. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the same, respondent Nos.2 to 4 and their supporting staff are frequently interfering with his possession over the subject land and causing inconvenience for enjoyment of the same.

6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 3 has not disputed the assignment deed document No.12451 of 1980, dated 31.12.1980 executed in favour of the petitioner.

7. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the 8. This Court, without expressing any opinion on the right and entitlement of the petitioner or the claim of the Government, deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondent authorities not to disturb the possession of the petitioner over the subject land, in any manner. It is made clear that if the petitioner is found to have violated any of the conditions of the assignment or if the petitioner is in possession of the Government land, the respondent authorities shall take appropriate action in accordance with law.

9. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________

C.V.BHASKAR REDDY, J Dt.25.06.2025

KRL