SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 52013

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
Vuppala Pavan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 5466/2025



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5466 of 2025, CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5516 of 2025, AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5504 of 2025,

COMMON ORDER:

1. (a). Criminal Petition No. 5466 of 2024 has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter ‘BNSS, 2023’), seeking to quash the proceedings against Petitioners 1 to 4 (Accused Nos. 1, 3 to 5) in Calendar Case No. 20 of 2024, pending before the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Nampally, Hyderabad.

(b). Criminal Petition No. 5516 of 2024, also under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, seeks similar relief for Petitioners 1 to 4 (Accused Nos.

1 to 4) in Calendar Case No. 22 of 2024 before the same court.

(c). Criminal Petition No. 5504 of 2024, again under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, seeks quashing of proceedings against Petitioners 1 to 4 (Accused Nos. 1 to 4) in Calendar Case No. 24 of 2024, also before the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Nampally, Hyderabad.

2. In each of these cases, the petitioners are charged with offences under Sections 406 and 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’), Section 76 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982, and Section 5 of the Telangana State Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishments Act, 1999 (‘TSPDFE Act’).

3. I have heard arguments of Mr. N. Naveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 1.

Summary of Prosecution Cases:

4. (a). Calendar Case No. 20 of 2024 (Criminal Petition No. 5466 of

2024):

Petitioner No. 1 approached the de facto complainant, representing that he operated a registered chit fund business with Vuppala Naveen Kumar under the name Sree Nagarjuna Enterprises, and requested the complainant to refer subscribers. The complainant got enrolled his wife and others as subscribers. After paying the required instalments, when the complainant’s wife sought to collect the prize amount, Petitioner No. 1 evaded payment. The complainant later learnt that other subscribers were similarly denied repayment, resulting in a collective financial loss exceeding Rs. 1 crore. Based on the police report, Crime No. 103 of

2022 was registered.

(b). Calendar Case No. 22 of 2024 (Criminal Petition No. 5516 of

2024):

The complainant, a Director of Coruscant Systems Private Limited, Hyderabad, participated in a chit operated by Nagarjuna Enterprises Chit and Finance Company. After making the necessary payments, he became the successful bidder in January 2021 and was entitled to Rs. 18,59,625/-. However, when he approached Pavan Kumar Vuppala for payment, the amount was not paid and the latter absconded. Crime No. 90 of 2022 was registered by Mahankali Police Station, later re-registered as Crime No. 263 of

2022 by District Hyderabad Police Station CCS, EOW Team-VIII.

(c). Calendar Case No. 24 of 2024 (Criminal Petition No. 5504 of

2024):

The complainant alleged that Petitioner No. 1, Vuppala Ramesh, introduced Petitioner No. 2, Vuppala Pavan Kumar, and solicited investments in Sree Nagarjuna Enterprises, promising 1.5% monthly interest. The complainant and his wife deposited Rs. 25,00,000/- and joined a chit group for Rs. 5,00,000/-. Promissory notes were executed, but upon maturity, no payments were made. Cheques issued by the petitioners were dishonoured, prompting the complainant to file a police report. Crime No. 102 of 2022 was registered by Mahankali Police Station, later re-registered as Crime No. 262 of 2022 by District Hyderabad Police Station CCS, EOW Team-VIII.

5. Following investigation and examination of witnesses and documents, the prosecution concluded that the petitioners, with criminal intent, operated an unauthorized chit fund business, causing wrongful loss to the complainants and others by collecting large sums and insisting on re-depositing the chit maturity amount. Accordingly, charges were filed under Sections 406, 420 read with 120-B of IPC, Section 76 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982, and Section 5 o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top