SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 52542

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
Om Prakash Pareek – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 7004/2025



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL PETITION No. 7004OF 2025

ORDER

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BharatiyaNagarikSurakshaSanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS, 2023’) seeking quashment of the proceedingsagainst the petitioner in Crime No.714 of 2025 of Hayathnagar Police Station, RachakondaCommissionerate.

2. The petitioner is sole accusedin Crime No.714 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 20(2) of the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 (for short‘COTPA’) and274 & 275of BharatiyaNyayaSanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS, 2023’).

3. Heard Mr. Y.BalaMurali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondents.

4. The prosecution case in brief is that the petitioner/accused is involved in selling and purchasing the banned Tobacco products and the Police concerned seized the said Tobacco products.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide Criminal Petition Nos.3731 and Batch quashed the proceedings against the petitioners therein by passing common order dated 27.08.2018. He further submits that the 2nd respondent has registered the present crime in violation of the orders passed by this Court. Hence, prayed for quashment of the proceedings against the petitioner in the crime.

6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit thatthe petitioner has to face either investigation or trial and prove his innocence and instead of doing so, he has filed the present criminal petition, which cannot be considered at this stage.

7. I have perused the materials on record.

8. As per the prosecution,on 03.06.2025 at 15:00 hours, the complainant/ Sub Inspector of Police lodged a complaint alleging that the petitioner is purchasing the Government banned gutkapackets from the unknown person and selling the same to the customers at his shop. Accordingly, the complainant and his staff apprehended the petitioner and seized tobacco products viz i.e., 1)V-01 Tobacco-2430 Pouches, 2) SS One Tobacco-1980 Pouches, 3) SR1-1 Tobacco-1400 Pouches, 4) KP Double Black-455 Pouches, 5) RR Gold-910 Pouches, 6) Raja Sree-360 Pouches, 7) Raja Tobacco-286 Pouches, 8) MIRAZ Tobacco

105 Pouches, 9) RR Gold Tobacco-420 Pouches, 10) ZLO1 Tobacco- 780 Pouches, 11) Swagath Tobacco-232 Pouches,d 12) MAHA Baba Tobacco-49 Pouches, 13) ChainiChaini Tobacco-150 Pouches, 14) Baba Tobacco-12 Pouches, 15) Amber Tobacco-175 Pouches, 16) Rahagir Tobacco-20 Pouches, 17) M-SENTED Tobacco-1200 Pouchesm and 18) A10 Ciggarates-390 Packetsunder cover of panchanama.

9. The related Notification No.501/FSS/I/2022 dated 07.01.2022,prohibiting manufacturing, storing, distribution, transportation and sale of gutka and pan masala in the entire State of Telangana,has been stayed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Shri Venkateshwara Traders v. State of Telangana and others vide SLA No.20441 of 2021 with SLP(C) No.1656 of 2022. Thereafter, the Director General of Police, Telangana State issued Circular Memorandum in RC.No.295/R1-NS/2022 with directions to the Station House Officers not to interfere with the business activities, who carry out the business as per rules of Food Safety and Standards Authority of India and also not to take any coercive measures against the tobacco traders as long as the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court is in force.

10. Having regard to this factual position, a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Crl.P.No.6235 of 2022 held that against the allegations of illegal selling and transportation of tobacco products the Sections 188, 269, 270, 272, 273, 278, 328 read with Sections 511, 336, 409 and 420 of I.P.C.,would not attract andquashed the proceedings against the petitioners therein.

11. In the instant petition, the prosecution for possession and allegation of sale arraigned the o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top