COMMON ORDER:

C.R.P.No.42 of 2021 is filed by the petitioner – auction purchaser aggrieved by the order dated 15.06.2018 passed in I.A.No.794 of 2016 in I.A.No.1609 of 2007 in O.S.No.417 of 2005 by the learned II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad for dismissing the petition filed by him seeking permission to deposit the balance consideration of the auction value worth of Rs.1,05,30,000/- to the credit of the matter.

2. C.R.P.No.15 of 2021 is filed by the same auction purchaser for allowing the petition filed by the plaintiffs vide I.A.No.859 of 2018 for re-sale of the suit schedule property by forfeiting the amount deposited by the auction purchaser under Order XXI Rules 85 & 86 of CPC.

3. The facts of the case in brief are that the petitioners in I.A.No.859 of 2018 filed O.S.No.417 of 2005 for partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property. A preliminary decree was passed therein and after it became final, the petitioners filed I.A.No.1609 of 2007 to pass a final decree. The trial court considering that the property could not be partitioned, directed sale of the same. In the sale conducted by the trial court, the petitioner in I.A.No.794 of 2016 sto