SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 52886

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
SYED MOHBOOB ALAM – Appellant
Versus
SYED MANZOOR ALAM – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL No.83 OF 2019

JUDGMENT:

This is an appeal filed by the appellant, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 29.12.2016 passed in O.S.No.994 of 2014 by the learned XI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short “the trial Court”).

2. The appellant herein is the plaintiff and the respondents 1 and 2 are the defendants before the trial Court. The parties herein are referred to as they were arrayed in the suit before the trial Court for the sake of convenience and clarity.

3. The case of the plaintiff before the trial Court is that late Smt. Late Qamar Sultana is the mother of the plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2 who was the original purchaser, owner and possessor of suit schedule property vide document No.2381 of 1961 having purchased the same from Muneeruddin S/o.Shaik Imam in the year 1961 with her own funds. It is their case that their mother Qamar Sultana died intestate on 19.10.1997 leaving behind her husband and three children and that subsequently her husband died leaving behind the plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2 herein. The plaintiff’s case is that Matruka property left by Smt. Qamar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top