SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 52982

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Shilpika Ketan Turakhia – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

What is the impact of Section 22-A(1)(a) of the Registration Act 1908 on registration of documents when the survey numbers are classified as Government Land? What recourse is available to a party where the Registering Authority finds that the subject land is Government Land or prohibited for transaction and whether writ petitions are maintainable under Article 226 in such circumstances? What are the grounds for dismissal of writ petitions challenging registration refusals in the context of alleged identity/title disputes and alleged misrepresentation of Dharani land details?

What is the impact of Section 22-A(1)(a) of the Registration Act 1908 on registration of documents when the survey numbers are classified as Government Land?

What recourse is available to a party where the Registering Authority finds that the subject land is Government Land or prohibited for transaction and whether writ petitions are maintainable under Article 226 in such circumstances?

What are the grounds for dismissal of writ petitions challenging registration refusals in the context of alleged identity/title disputes and alleged misrepresentation of Dharani land details?


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR

COMMON ORDER

filed seeking to set aside the Memo No.146, 145, 186 and 187 of 2023 dated 15.03.2023 and 12.04.2023, respectively, wherein and whereby, the 3rd respondent, Sub-Registrar, Champapet, refused registration of the Pending Documents No.P-60, 59, 84 and 85 of 2023, respectively, intimating the petitioners that as per Section 22-A(1)(a) of the Registration Act 1908 the survey numbers of the property comes under Government Land besides there is no NALA proceeding and the subject land falls under unauthorised layout.

2. Since the issues fell for consideration in all these writ petitions are common, whereby impugned Memos concerning the pending documents are questioned, as such, all these writ petitions are taken up for analogous hearing and are being disposed of by way of this common order.

3. It is to be noted that in W.Ps. No.9881, 9939, 9952 and 9963 of 2024, wherein the impugned Memos issued are pertaining to the Sale Deed Documents dated 04.02.2023, 04.03.2023 and 01.04.2023, respectively.

4. It is the case of the petitioners that on the earlier occasion they filed W.Ps. No.1739, 1736, 7357 and 7324 of 2023 aggrieved by the action

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top